Tag Archives: quota

Why is the U.S. mad about who sells cheese in Canada?

Cheese has once again become a hot topic in the Canada-U.S. trade dispute.

While officials work to lower sectoral tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum, the U.S. wants Canada to change its strict rules on importing cheese, which a Canadian agricultural economist warns heavily against.

“It’s not in the Canadian interest,” explains Al Mussell, a prominent Canadian agricultural economist and policy analyst.

Last month, U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order threatening a 50 per cent tariff on Canada’s dairy sector, which is now in a three day suspension period as negotiations continue.

Raphael Kaiser stores some of the artisinal cheeses at the production facility of Fromagerie Fritz Kaiser in Noyan, Que., Thursday, Oct. 11, 2018.THE CANADIAN PRESS/Ryan Remiorz

Mussell explains that the U.S. wants more control over who can access Canadian retailers directly, so they can export some of their premium products to Canada.

“Of course, that’s not how our system works,” he says, adding that allowing it would threaten Canadian processors and complicate the domestic raw milk allocation system.

Canada currently gives dairy import quota access mainly to processors, while retailers are excluded under CUSMA. The U.S. argues that this restriction creates an unfair playing field because retailers are granted access under Canada’s trade agreement with the European Union.

The U.S. administration says “Canada is discriminating against the commerce of the United States through Canada’s tariff-rate quota allocation measures imposed on U.S. cheeses of all types.”

Canada and the U.S. have fought over this before

The dispute over who gets access to Canada’s dairy quotas is not new.

The U.S. first launched a formal dispute under CUSMA, arguing that Canada’s dairy import system shut out U.S. producers because it gave almost all its import permits to domestic dairy factories.

After a trade panel ruled that this was unfair, Canada changed the rules to let other dairy businesses, like distributors, get the permits too. However, retailers remain excluded.

A cow in a dairy farm, Tuesday, January 23, 2024 in Saguenay Que. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jacques Boissinot

When the U.S. challenged Canada again, arguing retailers should also be allowed direct access, the panel sided with Canada, saying it was in compliance with CUSMA.

Mussell says the U.S. continuing to press the issue despite that ruling is not a good sign.

“I think it goes far beyond cheese or dairy products,” he says.

“When the President can come in and make threats that contravene a decision that the dispute panel under the CUSMA agreement rendered… that’s really troubling.”

What happens if retailers get more access?

Mussell says giving grocery retailers direct access would not increase the total amount of U.S. cheese entering Canada, since the quota is already essentially filled, but it could shift sales away from Canadian manufacturers.

He says it could also complicate Canada’s supply management system because raw milk is allocated to processing plants on a regulated basis.

Cows are milked at a dairy farm in Granby, Que., on Wednesday, Feb. 5, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Christinne Muschi

“That could be costly to the Canadian dairy industry,” he says.

Mussell also warns that giving grocery retailers more direct access to imports could strengthen their negotiating position with Canadian dairy suppliers.

“Your’re kind of arming them in terms of the sorts of relations that they can have with their dairy suppliers,” he says.

‘Our national food sovereignty is not up for negotiation’

In response to the tariff threat, a joint letter by the Dairy Farmers of Canada and the Dairy Processors Association of Canada last week expressed disappointment that the dairy sector was dragged into a trade dispute once again.

“Our national food sovereignty is not up for negotiation,” said David Wiens, president of DFC.

“It is also clear that Canadians believe in the importance of having control over our food supply and ensuring that Canada’s strong domestic dairy sector is not compromised.”

The trade relationship in dairy already “massively favours the U.S.” said Mathieu Frigon, president of the DPAC.

“U.S. dairy exports to Canada far exceed Canadian dairy exports to the U.S. by more than $600 million annually and have increased by more than 150% since CUSMA came into effect,” said Frigon.

What about the quality of U.S. dairy?

Mussell says even if more U.S. milk entered Canada, there is a major difference between Canadian and U.S. dairy quality standards.

“You could have milk that shipped under the U.S. Grade A that would not be saleable in any province in Canada,” he says.

Canadian milk is seen at grocery store in Ottawa, on Wednesday, April 2, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Justin Tang

Moreover, he says a significant amount of American milk doesn’t even meet its own Grade A standard.

“Is that product being exported to Canada, made from that milk? We don’t know. They don’t label. We have no way of knowing that,” says Mussell.

He says federal funding for labs that monitor the U.S. milk testing system stopped last year.

“What’s the nature of the safety and quality of product that we’re getting from the United States? I don’t know that we have an answer for that, and it’s concerning,” says Mussell.

Anam Khan

For the Silo, Anam Khan/ BNNBloomberg.ca

What Was Wrong With Canada Membership In Trans-Pacific Partnership?

“For the Canadian government, the TPP offers cover for major reforms to supply management, the combination of tariffs, quotas and price supports that increase costs for dairy, eggs, chicken, turkey and broiler hatching eggs. The system has been politically untouchable for decades, but using a backdoor approach of mandating change through trade agreement might provide the mechanism to garner the necessary popular support.” University of Ottawa researcher Michael Geist image:20thCenturyFox

Egg and dairy farmers take note…..If you haven’t heard about the Trans-Pacific Partnership (aka TPP) you’re not alone. This major, multinational trade agreement, conducted in private closed-door meetings had already voted on several key issues even before President Obama invited Canada to join this spring.

The TPP now includes the United States, Australia, Brunei, Chili, Malaysia, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore , Vietnam, Mexico and now Canada. Some economists have argued that since Canada already has free trade agreements with 4/10 of the TPP members we are not likely to see much ‘return on our buck’.

So the question then: Why has our Federal government shown so much interest? Is there a chance that by signing on to TPP, Canada could use the agreement conditions to make sweeping regulator changes in our country? And if the media reports circulating are to be believed (enter “Canada joins TPP” into your fave search engine) it seems inevitable that Stephen Harper’s government will soon announce Canada’s membership.

Law Professor Michael Geist image:cybera.ca

This from an online  feature by University of Ottawa researcher Michael Geist :
“With Canada already surrendering negotiation leverage and few important markets at stake, our participation is less about other TPP countries and much more about us. Business groups such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce applauded Canada’s entry into the TPP, (http://www.uschamber.com/press/releases/2012/june/us-chamber-applauds-canada%E2%80%99s-entry-trans-pacific-partnership-negotiations) expressing the hope that it would force further changes to Canadian intellectual property laws less than 24 hours after Bill C-11 passed in the House of Commons.

[From 2011, NDP MP Andrew Cash points out concerns regarding Bill C-11 CP]

For the Canadian government, the TPP offers cover for major reforms to supply management, the combination of tariffs, quotas and price supports that increase costs for dairy, eggs, chicken, turkey and broiler hatching eggs. The system has been politically untouchable for decades, but using a backdoor approach of mandating change through trade agreement might provide the mechanism to garner the necessary popular support.

While backers maintain that the TPP will open up new markets to Canadian companies, the reality is that the agreement’s biggest impact is likely to come from major domestic legislative reforms that would otherwise face considerable opposition and serious political risk.”
(http://www.thestar.com/business/article/1216011–what-s-behind-canada-s-entry-to-the-trans-pacific-partnership-talks )

So, is this a move towards governmental controls and legislative reform? Time will tell but will John and Jane Q Public even notice when it does?  CP

Supplementalhttps://www.eff.org/issues/tpp     http://www.michaelgeist.ca/