Green Party Emphatic No To Proposed ‘Tar Sands Oil’ Pipelines In Ontario

Oil pipelines already cross Canada and the United States- Ontario's Green Party stands opposed to a proposed Oil pipeline (using a modified natural gas pipeline) set to cross into and through Ontario. CP image: leadenergy.org
Oil pipelines already cross Canada and the United States- Ontario’s Green Party stands opposed to a proposed Oil pipeline (using a modified natural gas pipeline) set to cross into and through Ontario. CP image: leadenergy.org

Ottawa – Green Party leader Mike Schreiner is pledging to fight two oil pipeline projects through Ontario.  Joining Ottawa South candidate Taylor Howarth on a campaign tour, Schreiner and Howarth raised concerns about the health, environmental and economic effects of TransCanada Corp.’s proposed east coast pipeline, which travels through Ottawa, and Enbridge’s proposed Line 9 pipeline. Both projects
will pump tar sands oil east.

“Greens will fight for the health and safety of our communities,” says Schreiner. “If BC can say no to dirty oil pipelines, Ontario should too.”    TransCanada’s proposed Energy East pipeline could transport as much as 850,000 barrels of tar sands oil per day. The project would require retrofitting a 55 year old natural gas pipeline to handle the heavy, more abrasive and corrosive tar sands oil.

“I don’t want to see a tragedy in my community, and I will fight to prevent it,” says Howarth. “This pipeline was not built to handle tar sands oil, and as MPP, I will push the Ontario government to oppose the project. Every vote for the Green Party sends this message to Queen’s Park.”

According to the Montreal Gazette- Municipalities and Counties strung along the Line 9b pathway received cash donations from Enbridge. CP
According to the Montreal Gazette- Municipalities and Counties strung along the Line 9b pathway received cash donations from Enbridge. CP

 

Studies in the U.S. reveal that pipelines carrying tar sands oil spilled almost three times as much crude oil per mile of pipeline between 2007 and 2010 compared to the U.S. national average. And heavy tar sands oil is more difficult and expensive to clean up than light crude or natural gas.    “Both of these pipeline projects are a bad deal for Ontario,” says Schreiner.

“These pipelines are all risk and no reward.”   Instead of projects that will increase pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, the Green
Party is calling for policies to support clean tech innovation.    “Ontario must invest in where the puck is going, not where it is, to create jobs and clean prosperity,” says Schreiner. “Ontario should commit to building electric cars that don’t pollute and support made in Ontario renewable energy, not pipelines that threaten our communities.”   For the Silo, Becky Smit.

Supplemental-  Ontario Energy Workers union backs proposed Line 9 Oil pipeline  http://business.financialpost.com/2013/07/09/energy-workers-union-backs-line-9-project-calls-for-stricter-oil-by-rail-regulation/?__lsa=6225-fce3

Enbridge Website Line9 Reversal Phase 1 Project Overview http://www.enbridge.com/ECRAI/Line9ReversalProject

Comments

3 responses to “Green Party Emphatic No To Proposed ‘Tar Sands Oil’ Pipelines In Ontario”

  1. Toby Barrett Avatar

    Line 5 pipeline critical to Nanticoke Industrial Park

    Imperial Oil’s refinery at the Nanticoke Industrial Park is a key anchor in our Haldimand-Norfolk industrial economy.

    Since the early 1980s, our area’s refinery has provided around 300 full-time jobs in addition to a daily average of 200 contractor positions.

    Locally, Imperial Oil in Nanticoke has already gone through tough times with the recent four-month shutdown of the CN Rail line between Caledonia and the Nanticoke refinery.

    About 25 per cent of the petroleum products used in Ontario go through a supply chain, including Imperial Nanticoke. That supply chain consists of rail, road, water, and, of course, pipeline— moving diesel, gasoline, aviation fuel, asphalt, heavy oil and home heating oil.

    The Line 5 pipeline running through the Straits of Mackinac from the West is crucial for the operation of the economy in Ontario and Quebec as well as Ohio, Pennsylvania and certainly Michigan itself.

    If the Governor of Michigan were successful in shutting down the Line 5, it would jeopardize 65 per cent of the propane going to Michigan’s Upper Peninsula, and 55 per cent of the propane requirements across the state. A shutdown would put at risk half the jet fuel supply to Detroit Metro Airport.

    The governor would know that Michigan is Ontario’s largest export market and the largest source of imports into our province, totaling $82.3 billion in two-way trade — the largest two-way trading partnership between the U.S. and Canada. Close to 600,000 jobs in Michigan, depend on trade and investment with Canada.

    The only thing Michigan will accomplish with this political decision is to drive up the cost of living for millions of people. They will not make it safer because it has proven to be safe. They will not help their own economy with this chosen a political route as opposed to an economic route.

    I have met with Imperial on this issue. They are supporting Enbridge in its advocacy for keeping the pipeline open and working closely with the trades. Imperial also engages regularly on this threat with our senior government officials as well as the federal government.

    The goal is to see the operation of the pipeline continue. However, Imperial’s teams are also required to work on a combination of contingency plans involving marine, rail, and truck to help mitigate any potential impact. These alternatives are costlier and environmentally riskier and are incapable of replacing the lost pipeline supply.

    Enbridge Line 5 crossing at the Mackinac Straits has been in service without leaking since 1953. That is a track record of success and environmental responsibility by everyone involved. In May 2016, under the Obama administration, the United States Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, the federal regulator in charge of pipeline safety, commissioned an extensive safety review that found no serious problems with this operation. In June 2020, a follow-up report concluded that a reported displaced anchor placed no threat to the pipeline.

    Preventing the shutdown of Line 5 requires a Team Canada and, in fact, a Team North America approach. Prime Minister Trudeau should intervene by upholding an existing international pipeline treaty that protects Line 5. We are all friends-and-neighbours and allies. Our great and close working relationship must continue, as must the flow of product through Line 5.

    Toby Barrett MPP for Haldimand-Norfolk Ontario

  2. Chelsea Tucker Avatar

    Statement from Conservative Leader Erin O’Toole on Keystone XL

    January 17, 2021
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    Ottawa, ON — The Hon. Erin O’Toole, Leader of Canada’s Conservatives and the
    Official Opposition, today released the following statement addressing reports that
    President-elect Joe Biden will cancel the Keystone XL pipeline extension:

    “If true, this move will devastate thousands of Canadian families who have already
    been badly hurt by the economic crisis. We need a recovery for all Canadians, in
    every part of Canada, in every sector – including energy. Keystone XL is a project
    of national significance that supports countless workers on both sides of the
    border.

    “At a time when both countries need to focus on job creation, and strengthened
    bilateral relations, I call on the Prime Minister to immediately reach out to the
    incoming U.S. administration to stop this from happening and stand up for working
    Canadians across Canada. I also call upon the incoming U.S. administration to meet
    with our Prime Minister and affected workers prior to making this decision.”

    For more information:
    Chelsea Tucker
    chelsea.tucker@parl.gc.ca Please mention The Silo when contacting.

  3. Environmental Defence Canada Avatar

    Victory! Energy East is Dead

    TransCanada recently decided to cancel its proposed Energy East pipeline, which would have sent 1.1 million barrels per day of tar sands bitumen to the east coast. This is great news for the climate and all Canadians that stood up for our land, water and communities. It’s clear that new tar sands pipelines don’t make sense – economically or environmentally – in a world that is tackling climate change and moving away from fossil fuels.

    more at http://www.environmentaldefence.ca

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.