- M5 Scooter: foldable, electric and Summer perfect
- Shakespeare’s Star Wars. A mash-up play in a pub, this is.
- Barrett intro’s Private Member Bill: 13% of all adult Ontarians are public sector employees!
- Armstrong’s Heartbeat As Merged Artwork Radio Sent To Moon
- Grand Erie school board offers speaker session on LGBTQ perspectives and allies in education
Questions and deliberations concerning globalization are more than a hot topic of extended cross-disciplinary focus in academia; they are also central to the long-simmering debates regarding policies and their implications that today often enter the public arena. For example, a quick perusal of broadly accessible media outlets from late 2013 and early 2014 reflects a suite of still unresolved but vibrant civic pondering: “When did globalization start” (The Economist 2013), “The dark side of globalization: why Seattle’s 1999 protesters were right” (Smith 2014), and “Have we reached the end of globalization?: (CNN 2014).
Yet can such issues really be evaluated judiciously without defining the critical elements of globalization, and then dissecting and assessing its historical scope? Given the broad temporal and spatial elements implied by the concept of “globalization”, it is not most likely that the outcomes and effects of this multifaceted process would be highly variable across time and space?
But through a diachromic and comparative examination of human connections over time, might we see some commonalities and learn relevant lessons?
Continue reading this essay by Gary Feinman by clicking here.
*Banner image of Ronald McDonald -McDonalds China courtesy of image.minyanville.com